LSM-ONLINE-LOGO2JPG.jpg (4855 bytes)

Current
Home
Calendar

Back Issues
LSM Issues
LSV Issues

Features
WebNews
Newswire
Throat Doctor
Interviews
Concert Reviews
CD Critics
Books Reviews
PDF Files

Links
Audio
Midi

LSM
About LSM
LSM News
Distribution
Advertising
Guest Book
Contact Us
Site Search
Web Search

On the Aisle

 

[INDEX]


Carnegie Hall: London Philharmonic Orchestra

By Philip Anson / October 7, 2002
On the Aisle


The London Philharmonic Orchestra rolled into Carnegie Hall on its American tour for two programs on Oct. 7 and Oct. 8, 2002. The London Philharmonic Orchestra is not to be confused with the more prestigious and refined London Symphony Orchestra (a similar confusion exists between the superb Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra and the more pedestrian Vienna Symphony Orchestra). The London Philharmonic Orchestra is a serviceable group which plays in the pit at the Glyndebourne Opera in the summer, makes numerous soundtrack recordings, and prides itself on educational outreach work.

BashmetCarnegie Hall was almost full for the Oct. 7 concert (the only one I attended). The audience was packed with friends, family and fans of Russian violist Yuri Bashmet (photo left) who played the Walton Viola Concerto, no doubt a nod to the centenary of Walton’s birth this year. Bashmet is reputedly one of the world’s great violists, yet his playing on this occasion was unremarkable. While commanding a full tone and complete technical command of his instrument, his reading suffered from an apparent unfamiliarity with the concerto in question. His eyes were glued to the score on the stand in front of him in what looked and sounded like sight reading. This despite the fact that Bashmet and the London Philharmonic Orchestra played the same program three days earlier in Philadelphia.

The concert opened with Prokofiev’s Symphony No. 5 (1944), a wartime opus composed for Koussevitsky and the Boston Symphony Orchestra. It is not one of Prokofiev’s more inspired works and under the leaden baton of Kurt Masur it sounded like a potboiler, comparing unfavorably to the thrilling works Shostakovich was composing around the same time. Masur, despite being the London Philharmonic Orchestra’s principal conductor, seemed to have little rapport with the orchestra. Interpretation was limited to cueing entries and adjusting the volume. Prokofiev’s music needed an energizing hand to chisel surfaces, galvanize rhythms, and inject vigor. Instead it got ineffectual poking and prodding.

The final piece on the program was Richard Strauss’s Till Eulenspiegel. This chestnut was at least familiar, and the programmatic musical hijinks came as a relief. Still, it was merely an average performance, with a sour horn.

The London Philharmonic Orchestra’s 2002 tour includes Philadelphia, Washington, Boston, and Newark. Their Chicago gig was cancelled, which is no loss to the Windy City, home of the superior Chicago Symphony. The Philadelphia Inquirer critic panned the Oct. 4 performance of the same program I heard, complaining of “routine playing” and other shortcomings (“The character of the orchestra? It's not the most virtuosic, it does not have the greatest sound, and [...] it did not achieve the kind of close ensemble that is instinct to the world's best orchestras.”) Critics in other cities seemed more pleased with the London Philharmonic Orchestra’s second program - Beethoven’s Symphony 1 and Bruckner Symphony 7.

> Carnegie Hall



[INDEX]


(c) La Scena Musicale 2001 and Philip Anson